They’re all interesting in their own right. So in the end, Green says in preparation for Blade Runner 2049, it’s dealer’s choice as far as which version of Blade Runner you watch: Image via Warner Bros./Alcon Entertainment People ask often, 'Which version should I watch if I haven’t seen it?' I say the easiest answer is, 'Whichever you can watch tonight.'" I got to argue with Denis about that-and he respects opinions, because there’s no right or wrong.
So, going into a potential sequel was just a recognition that those are chief among the themes at play. And after that, you get to fanboy out amongst everyone else working on the film, learn what their favorite version is and why. That the search for authenticity is the character’s journey, and it is also the journey of a fan. "No, it’s one of the great ideas of the film-that the subject of subjectivity is woven through the story. So, between the theatrical cut, “director’s cut”, and final cut, which version of Blade Runner should you see before watching Blade Runner 2049? Co-writer Michael Green was asked by io9 if they had to choose which version he and co-writer Hampton Fancher were writing a sequel to, and his answer may surprise/frustrate you:
#Blade runner 2049 izle movie
approved the release of that version as a “director’s cut.” And then there’s The Final Cut, which was released in 2007 and is the only version of the movie over which Scott had complete editorial control. But after positive responses to Scott’s original workprint version at arthouse theaters, Warner Bros.
forcing some changes for the theatrical release, including that infamous narration.
Blade Runner 2049 is a curious sequel in that there are multiple versions of the original movie, leading many to wonder which one serves as the real original leading up to this sequel? Negative responses to preview showings of Ridley Scott’s 1982 original led to Warner Bros.